Legal AI software for legal tech platforms

Your legal platform, with AI that cites the record and keeps every approved name and figure as written.

For court reporting, transcript, legal document and records software with live users. We build AI into your product from your own documents, keep confidential files where they belong, and ship it under your name.

  • Every answer cited to its page, or declined
  • Confidential files stay where they belong
  • A person confirms what is published or released

Three ways to start, from $5,000: Build Sprint · Planning Sprint · AI Scorecard

Docketly by Datics AI · Try it step by step →

Illustrative demo on a fictional agency and firm. Not client work.

Why legal AI stalls in established platforms

What gets in the way, and how we handle it.

  1. 01

    Confidential files on your servers

    Files stay with their owner

    Extraction runs in the customer's browser or reads approved text only, so originals stay in their system of record.

  2. 02

    Answers nobody can check

    Cite, or decline

    Every answer cites the passage it came from, and when the files do not cover a question, it says so.

  3. 03

    A model that rewrites the facts

    Approved terms locked

    Approved names, places and acronyms are locked before any check, and only flagged spans go to the model.

  4. 04

    Matters that must never mix

    Scope before ranking

    Retrieval is filtered by tenant, matter and clearance before anything is ranked, and fails closed.

  5. 05

    AI that could publish or release

    People release

    AI reads, drafts and checks; a person publishes every record and releases every file.

Why AI earns its place in your product

List more records

Title pages read for the agency.

Agencies confirm fields instead of typing them, and the file stays on their computer.

Keep users

Answers attorneys can check.

Cited answers from the matter's own files, inside the platform where the files are kept.

Easier to review

Built for confidential work.

People decide, sources are shown, and files stay with the party that owns them.

Modules by Datics AI

Start from AI we have already built, not from zero.

Legaltech AI you can see before you buy: each module runs on a fictional agency or firm and builds on document AI and legal platform work we have delivered. The list also includes two services, one of them encryption, not AI.

  • Agencies select a transcript, and its title page fills itself without the file leaving their computer.

    Fits: Transcript marketplaces, court reporting software, deposition and records platforms

  • A deposition summary by topic and witness, with every statement cited to page and line.

    Fits: Court reporting platforms, litigation support and deposition software, transcript archives

  • Names, contact details, account numbers and marked terms found and proposed for redaction, with a reason for each.

    Fits: Legal document and production software, records release platforms, transcript marketplaces

  • Contracts and their amendments read into clause fields, each value with the page it came from.

    Fits: Contract management and contract review software, legal document platforms, procurement tools

  • Transcripts sold and released through your platform, readable only by the attorney who paid.

    Fits: Transcript marketplaces, records release and legal document delivery platforms

  • Ask a question of a matter's files and get an answer that cites the page, or says the files are silent.

    Fits: Legal document management, knowledge and research platforms, transcript and records archives

  • Grammar, paraphrase and style checks that leave every approved name, date and figure as written.

    Fits: Legal drafting and knowledge platforms, transcript and summary tools, archive and records software

  • Every statement in a draft checked against the record, with the page behind each result.

    Fits: Legal drafting, research and knowledge platforms, deposition summary and review tools

Also for your product

Your product, inside Claude and ChatGPT.

We build a connector so your users can ask their own AI assistant about their data in your product, each signed in with their own login and seeing only what they can already see. It starts read-only, only the fields you approve leave your product, and actions each user approves can come later.

How we build connectors
Illustrative example · A paralegal, in ChatGPT

Which transcripts in this matter are still waiting on the reporter?

Two, with the deposition date and the expected delivery for each.

Proof

Our legal tech and document AI work.

Legal platform work for Transcripts U.S., and document intelligence for Neno Technologies (NenoDoc Lexicon and NenoBrief) and WikiTeq, and claim verification for SovrenAI.

57 featured AI case studies across our work

Transcripts U.S.

Court reporting · Transcript indexing

Court reporting agencies publish transcript metadata without the file ever leaving their browser

Agencies once uploaded full transcripts to the marketplace; now title page details are read in their own browser, and they confirm what is published.

Brownfield AIInside a live productDocument intelligence
Read case study

NenoBrief by Neno Technologies

Document AI · Cited answers in production

Archive officers get cited answers inside their live document system, files never copied

Archive records could not reach an outside AI. Now the client's live document system calls our self-hosted gateway for cited answers.

Brownfield AIInside a live productCited answers
Read case study

Transcripts U.S.

Court reporting · Encrypted release

Attorneys receive deposition transcripts that even the marketplace cannot read

The marketplace could once read every transcript it held; now each file is encrypted in the agency's browser and opens only in the paying attorney's.

Brownfield AIInside a live productPermission-aware
Read case study

More document AI work

NenoDoc Lexicon by Neno Technologies

Document AI · Self-hosted workspace

Archive teams get cited answers in French and English on one client-owned GPU

Sensitive archives could not go to an outside AI. Now teams ask in French or English and get answers cited to the page, all on the client's GPU.

AI-native productCited answersDocument intelligence
Read case study

NenoDoc Lexicon by Neno Technologies

Document AI · Writing that keeps the facts

Archive indexers fix grammar and style without a name, date or figure changing

AI rewrites can quietly alter names and numbers. Ours edits only flagged spans, and approved terms are locked before the model sees them.

AI-native productHuman approvalDocument intelligence
Read case study

WikiTeq

AI engine · Cited document answers

WikiTeq's self hosted AI chat now answers from its documents, citing every source

The chat could not answer from the firm's own documents. Now a separate retrieval service feeds it passages and shows the source of each answer.

Brownfield AICited answersInside a live product
Read case study
  • “What impresses me the most is their belief in our vision and willingness to work through challenges alongside us.”

    Keli McGilton · Co-Founder, Transcripts U.S.

    See the work
See all our AI case studies

How it works

Three ways to start, each at a fixed price.

A 30-minute review tells you which one fits. Whichever you pick, you know the production price before you commit, and your fee counts toward it.

Legal Tech Platform Product Review · 30 minutes, no chargeStart here. We look at your platform with you, agree the outcome you want for your users, and tell you which of the three below fits.

Book a 30-minute Product Review

No AI yet, and a module fits

Build Sprint

$10,000 fixed3 weeks

Pick it when: One of our modules delivers the outcome you want.

Docketly · Digestly · Redactly · Clausely · Recordly · Proofly · Attestly

  • One user outcome (2 to 3 related capabilities) working in your staging, behind a feature flag
  • Pull requests to your repo, built on sample transcripts, case files and synthetic matters
  • Quality and safety evals, the cost per user and a packaging recommendation
  • A fixed-price quote for production

Something new, or a plan first

Planning Sprint

$5,000 fixed2 weeks

Pick it when: You need something our modules do not cover, or want a plan before you build.

  • Where AI fits across your platform, including beyond our modules
  • A prioritized capability map, with what each one depends on
  • A readiness review of your architecture, data, integrations and permissions
  • A fixed-price quote to build it and take it to production

AI already built or tried

AI Scorecard

$5,000 fixed2 weeks

Pick it when: You have already built or tried an AI feature in your platform, live or not.

  • One AI feature you have built, tested in staging on 50 of your own cases, with names and contact details removed
  • Tests for invented names and citations, another matter's documents, changed figures and prompt injection
  • Cost per user and a packaging recommendation
  • A scorecard, ranked fixes, draft security answers and a fixed quote

Not a compliance audit or certification.

How the AI Scorecard works

Production, at a fixed quote

We take what your Sprint built or planned live for your users, by pull request, with no standing production access. It typically includes load testing at your peak and a spend cap per firm. Your Sprint or Scorecard fee counts toward it.

After go-live, optional support

The product is finished and yours to run. If you want us to stay on: a named lead engineer, a monthly quality and cost report, testing before any model change, and more capabilities, each at its own fixed quote.

Stop after any Sprint and keep what you got.

How a Build Sprint runs

  • In the setup week we map your platform, documents and roles and agree what the Sprint touches.
  • We follow your coding standards, tests and CI; your engineers review and merge every pull request.
  • Half at signature, half when the Sprint Pack is delivered.
  • Your time: about 2 to 3 hours a week from a product owner, plus an engineer to review pull requests.

Need integrations first? Custodly covers files only the paying attorney can open. Ask in the Product Review.

Built for confidential legal records

Controls your customers' security reviews ask about.

Each control is a design fact about how the module is built and how we work, not a compliance claim.

  • Files stay with their owner

    Extraction in the user's browser or from approved text only, with originals left in their system of record.

  • Cite, or decline

    Every answer cites its passage, and the system says so when the files do not hold the answer.

  • People decide

    Records publish, files release and edits apply only when a person confirms them.

We work within your privilege and confidentiality obligations, court rules and privacy requirements. Compliance depends on the complete product, contracts, policies and operating environment; Datics does not present software engineering alone as legal certification, and nothing a module shows is legal advice on its own.

How we handle confidential legal records

In AI and data since2018

  • AWS: Select Tier Partner
  • Anthropic: Partner · Claude models
  • CopilotKit: Agent user interface
  • LangGraph: Production agent engineering
  • Databricks: Governed AI & agent workflows
  • Cursor: Agentic development environment
  • Microsoft Azure: Production AI delivery
  • Google Cloud: Production AI delivery

AI shipped inside products for

Peerlogic logoAMove logoDealership Toolkit logoIdeeza logoRVP Pricing Tool logo

Questions we hear on the first call

Straight answers before you book.

The questions legal tech product and engineering leaders ask most.

Do you build AI for law firms?

We build for the software companies that serve law firms, court reporting agencies and records teams. If your product brings AI into law firms' daily work, we build it inside your product, under your name, for your customers.

How do you stop the AI inventing a name, date or citation?

Answers come only from the passages retrieved for that user, each cited to its page, and the system declines when the files are silent. In writing tools, approved names, places and acronyms are locked before any check; names, numbers and attributions in a paraphrase are pinned and checked again after.

Can the AI publish a record or release a file?

No. It reads, drafts and checks. The agency or firm confirms each record, and every release or production needs a person's approval.

Can it run without sending files to an outside AI service?

Yes. We have built document AI that runs fully self-hosted on client-owned GPU hosts, with self-hosted OCR, and transcript extraction that runs in the user's browser.

Do you build AI contract review software?

We build the extraction underneath it. Clausely, our reference build, reads clauses and terms into your fields and leaves a missing clause blank and flagged, never guessed; the page behind each value is what a Build Sprint adds. It does not advise whether a term is good; your users and their counsel decide. A reviewer accepts each record. It builds on contract field extraction we have delivered and on version comparison inside a cited document platform.

Do you need our customers' documents in the Sprint?

No. Sprints run on sample transcripts, sample case files and synthetic matters in your staging, and code reaches your product as pull requests.

How do you choose a legal software development company?

Look for a team that has shipped AI and platform changes into live legal and document products: confidential files, citations users can check and roles that keep matters apart. Ask where the files go, who decides when the AI is wrong and who owns the code. We answer each of these in the Product Review, with the work behind it.

Who owns the code?

What we build for your product lives in your repository and ships under your name. The reusable engine underneath stays ours and is licensed to you; the terms are in your contract.

Do you have SOC 2?

Not yet. We work in your staging by pull request, under your accounts, and in production only through access you grant and can revoke.

Where are you based?

Datics is headquartered in Austin, Texas, with a named lead engineer and US-hours overlap on every engagement.

Legal tech insights

How we think about the hard parts.

Answers for product and engineering leaders, from the team that builds it.

RAG and AI assistants

How do you stop hallucination in AI document extraction?

AI document extraction from long documents gets reliable with type detection, retrieval per field, clear field definitions and empty values, not guesses.

Rana Umar Majeed · Sep 14, 2026

RAG and AI assistants

RAG evaluation: how do you test that citations hold up?

RAG evaluation must check more than whether citations exist. Test that each cited passage supports its claim and that answers decline when sources are silent.

Rana Umar Majeed · Oct 21, 2026

AI security and compliance

How does RAG security scope retrieval to user permissions?

RAG security in multi-tenant SaaS starts with whose documents a question may search. Learn how to filter by tenant and permission before ranking.

Rana Umar Majeed · Oct 20, 2026

AI security and compliance

How do you enforce tenant isolation beyond database rows?

Tenant isolation beyond database rows means boundaries per field and per role, in caches, files, payments and jobs, so no tenant sees what another owns.

Rana Umar Majeed · Oct 29, 2026

AI agents

Where should human in the loop AI review happen?

Human in the loop AI works when review happens field by field, before anything ships. Learn where to place checkpoints and how to measure accuracy.

Rana Umar Majeed · Oct 16, 2026

AI security and compliance

How do you build an AI audit trail you can reproduce?

An AI audit trail records who or what made each change, with which inputs and model, so reviewers can tell AI entries apart and reproduce any output.

Rana Umar Majeed · Sep 4, 2026

See it on your own platform.

Bring one product, workflow or AI feature. In 30 minutes we tell you which of the three ways to start fits, what it would cost to serve per user and what your customers' counsel will ask.

Own several legal software products? Datics for private equity 

Calls run in US Central time. No generic AI presentation: we discuss your product, users and production constraints.