AI for court reporting and transcript platforms
Transcripts listed without the file, and released only to the attorney who paid.
For transcript marketplaces and court reporting software. Title pages read in the agency's browser, files encrypted for the paying attorney, every request, payment and release on one ID, and deposition summaries cited to page and line.
Built for: Transcript marketplaces, court reporting software, deposition and records platforms.
Already built or tried AI? Get it scored with the AI Scorecard.
tessaline.example/calloway-ridge/transcripts/new
Calloway Ridge Reporting · Docketly
DemoStep 1 of 5
Illustrative demo on a fictional agency and firm. Not client work.
Where these products get stuck
What gets in the way, and how we handle it.
- 01
A platform that holds the transcript
Select, not upload
The title page is read in the agency's browser, and only the fields it approves are sent.
- 02
Admins who could read the file
Encrypted for the attorney
The agency's browser encrypts each file at release, locked to the paying attorney.
- 03
Requests tracked in email
One request ID
Every step from question to release, with its timestamp, on one platform ID.
What agencies ask before they list a transcript
Short answers your team can repeat.
- During discovery the transcript stays on the agency's computer.
- The agency confirms every field and every release.
- Platform admins cannot open released files.
- We work within your confidentiality obligations, court rules and privacy requirements.
AI inside your product
The modules and services that fit this kind of platform.
Each one is shown on a fictional customer. It is built into your codebase and ships under your name, on an engine we license to you.
What it connects to: Your transcript records, search, request and payment flows, sign in and notifications. Sprints use sample transcripts.
Docketlyby Datics AI
AI transcript indexing for court reporting platforms
Agencies select a transcript, and its title page fills itself without the file leaving their computer.
Fits: Transcript marketplaces, court reporting software, deposition and records platforms
Digestlyby Datics AI
AI deposition summaries with page and line citations
A deposition summary by topic and witness, with every statement cited to page and line.
Fits: Court reporting platforms, litigation support and deposition software, transcript archives
Custodlyby Datics AIService
Encrypted transcript and record release for legal marketplaces
Transcripts sold and released through your platform, readable only by the attorney who paid.
Fits: Transcript marketplaces, records release and legal document delivery platforms
Legal platform engineeringby Datics AIService
Legal software development for transcript and records platforms
Request, payment and release flows changed in stages on a live legal platform, while it keeps running.
Fits: Legal marketplaces, court reporting and records platforms with live users
Proof
What we have built that this rests on.
57 featured AI case studies: AI products and AI built into live products, each written up on our Work page.
Transcripts U.S.
Court reporting · Transcript indexing
Court reporting agencies publish transcript metadata without the file ever leaving their browser
Agencies once uploaded full transcripts to the marketplace; now title page details are read in their own browser, and they confirm what is published.
Transcripts U.S.
Court reporting · Encrypted release
Attorneys receive deposition transcripts that even the marketplace cannot read
The marketplace could once read every transcript it held; now each file is encrypted in the agency's browser and opens only in the paying attorney's.
NenoDoc Lexicon by Neno Technologies
Document AI · Writing that keeps the facts
Archive indexers fix grammar and style without a name, date or figure changing
AI rewrites can quietly alter names and numbers. Ours edits only flagged spans, and approved terms are locked before the model sees them.
How it works
Three ways to start, each at a fixed price.
Most transcript platforms start with Docketly in a Build Sprint: browser side extraction and agency review before publishing.
Legal Tech Platform Product Review · 30 minutes, no chargeStart here. We look at your platform with you, agree the outcome you want for your users, and tell you which of the three below fits.
Book a 30-minute Product ReviewNo AI yet, and a module fits
Build Sprint
$10,000 fixed3 weeks
Pick it when: One of our modules delivers the outcome you want.
- One user outcome (2 to 3 related capabilities) working in your staging, behind a feature flag
- Pull requests to your repo, built on sample transcripts, case files and synthetic matters
- Quality and safety evals, the cost per user and a packaging recommendation
- A fixed-price quote for production
Something new, or a plan first
Planning Sprint
$5,000 fixed2 weeks
Pick it when: You need something our modules do not cover, or want a plan before you build.
- Where AI fits across your platform, including beyond our modules
- A prioritized capability map, with what each one depends on
- A readiness review of your architecture, data, integrations and permissions
- A fixed-price quote to build it and take it to production
AI already built or tried
AI Scorecard
$5,000 fixed2 weeks
Pick it when: You have already built or tried an AI feature in your platform, live or not.
- One AI feature you have built, tested in staging on 50 of your own cases, with names and contact details removed
- Tests for invented names and citations, another matter's documents, changed figures and prompt injection
- Cost per user and a packaging recommendation
- A scorecard, ranked fixes, draft security answers and a fixed quote
Not a compliance audit or certification.
How the AI Scorecard worksProduction, at a fixed quote
We take what your Sprint built or planned live for your users, by pull request, with no standing production access. It typically includes load testing at your peak and a spend cap per firm. Your Sprint or Scorecard fee counts toward it.
After go-live, optional support
The product is finished and yours to run. If you want us to stay on: a named lead engineer, a monthly quality and cost report, testing before any model change, and more capabilities, each at its own fixed quote.
Stop after any Sprint and keep what you got.
How a Build Sprint runs
- In the setup week we map your platform, documents and roles and agree what the Sprint touches.
- We follow your coding standards, tests and CI; your engineers review and merge every pull request.
- Half at signature, half when the Sprint Pack is delivered.
- Your time: about 2 to 3 hours a week from a product owner, plus an engineer to review pull requests.
Product improvements you can measure
What we agree to measure: quality and cost on test sets in the Build Sprint, adoption and outcomes once it is in production, so the decision to go further is made on evidence.
More transcripts listed
Records published per agency each month
Less typing for agencies
Share of fields confirmed without an edit
Faster fulfillment
Time from request to release, per request ID
We set the success measures with you in the setup week.
Built for confidential legal records
Controls your customers' security reviews ask about.
Each control is a design fact about how the module is built and how we work, not a compliance claim.
Files stay with their owner
Extraction in the user's browser or from approved text only, with originals left in their system of record.
Cite, or decline
Every answer cites its passage, and the system says so when the files do not hold the answer.
People decide
Records publish, files release and edits apply only when a person confirms them.
We work within your privilege and confidentiality obligations, court rules and privacy requirements. Compliance depends on the complete product, contracts, policies and operating environment; Datics does not present software engineering alone as legal certification, and nothing a module shows is legal advice on its own.
How we handle confidential legal recordsQuestions we hear on the first call
Straight answers before you book.
Does this work with the court reporting software agencies use?
Agencies select files from their own computer today. A sync from their court reporting software is a later step we scope per platform in the Product Review.
Can title page details alone reveal private information?
They can. That is why agencies confirm every field before publishing. On a live marketplace, pilot feedback led us to propose matching to counsel of record and private, agency routed requests in place of open search.
Other legal tech platforms we build for
See it on your own platform.
Bring one product, workflow or AI feature. In 30 minutes we tell you which of the three ways to start fits, what it would cost to serve per user and what your customers' counsel will ask.
Calls run in US Central time. No generic AI presentation: we discuss your product, users and production constraints.